FAKTOR DAN KESAN KETERLIBATAN PELAJAR TERHADAP PENCAPAIAN AKADEMIK [FACTORS AND IMPLICATION OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT ON ACHIEVEMENT]
Keywords:
keterlibatan, faktor, kesan, tingkah laku, emosi, kognitif, engagement, factor, implication, behavioural, emotional, cognitiveAbstract
Abstrak: Pihak sekolah sering memberikan perhatian terhadap keterlibatan pelajar dalam pembelajaran. Keterlibatan pelajar dari sudut kognitif, tingkah laku dan emosi merupakan salah satu aspek pembelajaran dan perkembangan para pelajar di sekolah. Bagi memastikan tahap keterlibatan yang tinggi dalam kalangan pelajar, maka kajian terhadap faktor yang menarik perhatian pelajar untuk melibatkan diri mereka dalam pembelajaran amat penting untuk dikenalpasti. Satu kajian berbentuk sistematik review telah dijalankan untuk mengkaji faktor dan kesan keterlibatan pelajar terhadap pencapaian akademik. Model PRISMA dipilih untuk menjadi garis panduan dalam pencarian literatur. Sampel yang dipilih dalam kajian ini adalah dalam kalangan mereka yang berumur 7 hingga 26 tahun daripada negara yang berlainan. Kajian ini berbentuk gabungan antara kajian kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Reka bentuk kajian yang dipilih adalah reka bentuk eksperimental dan kuasi-eksperimental, korelasi dan kajian tinjauan. Instrumen kajian yang dipilih adalah melalui soal selidik dan ujian. Dapatan kajian telah menemui 15 faktor yang mempengaruhi keterlibatan pelajar dalam pembelajaran di sekolah. Faktor-faktor utama yang dikenalpasti dibahagikan kepada empat kategori iaitu demografi, kontekstual, individu dan persekitaran.
Abstract: Schools often pay attention to student engagement. Student involvement in terms of cognitive, behavioral and emotional is an aspect of student learning and development in school. To ensure a high level of involvement among students, then the factors are very important to be identified in advance. A systematic review study was conducted to examine the factors and effects of student involvement on academic achievement. The PRISMA model was chosen to be the guideline in the literature search. Among the samples selected in this study are between the ages of 7 to 26 years and above from different countries. This research is using a combination of quantitative and qualitative. The selected study designs were such as experimental and quasi-experimental, correlation and survey studies. The research instruments chosen were questionnaires and tests. The findings have found 15 factors that influence student involvement in learning in school. The main factors identified are divided into four categories namely demographic, contextual, individual and environmental.
References
Ahmad Fauzi, Aida Suraya & Rosnaini Mahmud. 2018. Pengaruh guru, rakan sebaya dan sokongan keluarga terhadap keterlibatan matematik dalam kalangan murid sekolah menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia 8(1): 1-12.
Alison E. Baroody, et al.,. 2016. A multi-method approach for describing the contributions of student engagement on fifth grade students’ social competence and achievement in mathematics. Learning and Individual Differences 48: 54-60
Boulton C. A., Hughes E., Kent C., Smith J. R., Williams H. T. P. 2019. Student engagement and wellbeing over time at a higher education institution. PLoS ONE 14(11): 1-20.
Durksen, T. L., Way, J., Bobis, J., Anderson, J., Skilling, K., & Martin, A. J. 2017. Motivation and engagement in mathematics: a qualitative framework for teacher-student interactions. Mathematics Education Research Journal 29(2): 163–181.
Estévez, I., Rodríguez-Llorente, C., Piñeiro, I., González-Suárez, R., Valle, A. 2021. School Engagement, Academic Achievement, and Self-Regulated Learning. Sustainability. 13: 1-15.
Gaylo, D. N. & Dales, Z. I. (2019). Metacognitive Strategies: Their Effects on Students’ Academic Achiebement World Review of Business Research Metacognitive Strategies: Their Effects on Students’ Academic Achievement and Engagement in Mathematics. Malaysia Journal of Mathematical Sciences 7(2): 35 – 55.
Hanita Yusoff & Norzaini Azman. 2018. Pencapaian akademik murid lelaki dan perempuan: peranan sokongan pembelajaran dan keterlibatan murid. Malaysia Journal of Learning and Instruction 15(2): 257-287.
Higgins, P. T., et al.,. 2011. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. Research Methods & Reporting. BMJ 2011; 342: d549
Holliman A. J., Martin A. J., Collie R. J. 2018. Adaptability, engagement, and degree completion: a longitudinal investigation of university students. Educ. Psychol. 38: 785–799.
Jie, Z. L., Ying, Z. & Zhao, M. A. 2019. The Corelation of Students’ Mathematics Learning Engagement on Their Academic Performance in Junior High School. Journal On Education 2(1): 213-227.
Leon. J, Medina-Garrido E & Núñez JL. 2017. Teaching quality in math class: the development of a scale and the analysis of its relationship with engagement and achievement. Front. Psychol 8:1-14
Lietaert, S., Roorda, D., Laevers, F., Verschueren, K., & De Fraine, B. (2015). The gender gap in student engagement: The role of teachers’ autonomy support, structure, and involvement. British Journal of Educational Psychology 85(4): 498–518.
Manisah Mohd Ali & Noorfaziha Hassan. 2014. Perspektif guru terhadap keterlibatan akademik dalam kalangan murid dengan ketidakupayaan penglihatan. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia 39(2): 109-114
Marks, H. M. 2000. Students engagement in instructional activity: patterns in the elementary, middle, an high school years. American Educational Research Journal 37 (1): 153-184.
Mehmet Firat, et.al. 2019. How e-learning engagement time affects academic achievement in e-learning environments. a large-scale study of open and distance learners. Open Praxis, 11(2): 129–141.
Mohamed Berawi. 2017. Metodologi penyelidikan: panduan menulis tesis. t.tp.: Universiti Utara Malaysia.
Nor Yuzie Yusuf, Rosini Abu, Aida Suraya Md Yunus. 2014. Tingkah laku, emosi dan kognitif murid sebagai faktor peramal pencapaian akademik. Journal of Human Capital Development 7(1): 1-19.
Powers, K. A. 2017. Educational Interventions to Improve Support for Family Presence during Resuscitation, K. A. (2017). A Systematic Review of the Literature. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing 36(2): 125-138.
Pratiwi, B., & Primana, L. 2018. The Relationship between Teachers’ Fostering Relevance Behavior and Middle School Students’ Cognitive Engagement in Mathematics. Conference: Universitas Indonesia International Psychology Symposium for Undergraduate Research (UIPSUR 2017), hal. 1-6
Ramos-Díaz, E.; Rodríguez-Fernández, A.; Revuelta, L. 2016. Validation of the spanish version of the school engagement measure (SEM). Span. J. Psychol. 19: 1-9.
Roorda, D. L., Jak, S., Zee, M., Oort, F. J., & Koomen, H. M. Y. 2017. Affective teacher–student relationships and students’ engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic update and test of the mediating role of engagement. School Psychology Review 46(3): 239–261.
Sierra-correa, P. C., Ricardo, J., & Kintz, C. 2015. Ecosystem-based adaptation for improving coastal planning for sea-level rise: A systematic review for mangrove coasts. Marine Policy 51: 385-393.
Skilling, K., Bobis, J., Martin, A. J., Anderson, J., & Way, J. 2016. What secondary teachers think and do about student engagement in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal 28(4): 545–566.
Sulaiman Ngah Razali 2002. Analisis Data Dalam Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur : Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Zalizan, M. Jelas, Amla, S., Norzaini, A., Rohana, J., Ramlah, H., Izwan, H., Zaleha, A., Hanizah & H., Hutkemri. 2014. Perbezaan gender dalam sokongan pembelajaran dan pencapaian akademik: peranan perantara keterlibatan murid di sekolah. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction 11: 257-287.
Zuraini Jusoh, Fadzilah Rahman, Norazlina Kiram & Samsilah Roslan. 2016. Motivasi belajar dan keterlibatan dalam pembelajaran kemahiran mengarang bahasa melayu. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 11(1): 213-226
