TAHAP KEBOLEHBACAAN E-BOOK BAHASA ARAB AKADEMIK LANJUTAN [THE READABILITY LEVEL OF THE ADVANCED ACADEMIC ARABIC E-BOOK

Authors

  • Nadzirah Norudin Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Nik Mohd Rahimi Nik Yusoff Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Mohamad Azwan Kamarudin Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Keywords:

kebolehbacaan, bahasa Arab, bahasa Arab akademik, readability, Arabic, academic Arabic

Abstract

Abstrak: Usaha menambahbaik kursus-kursus bahasa Arab di Institut Pengajian Tinggi (IPT) berupaya memperkasakan lagi penguasaan pelajar terhadap bahasa tersebut. Penguasaan pelajar terhadap bahasa Arab dapat diukur berdasarkan kebolehbacaan teks yang dipelajarinya. Oleh  itu, kajian ini bertujuan mengenal pasti tahap kebolehbacaan e-book kursus Bahasa Arab Akademik Lanjutan (BAAL)  terhadap pelajar sarjana muda di salah sebuah IPT di Malaysia. Reka bentuk kuantitatif secara tinjauan dilaksanakan ke atas 100 orang pelajar di lima program pengajian sarjana muda  pengajian Islam dengan kepujian di salah sebuah IPT di Malaysia. Data yang telah dianalisis secara analisis deskriptif menunjukkan tahap kebolehbacaan teks BAAL secara keseluruhannya berada di tahap kecewa iaitu tidak sesuai untuk tujuan pengajaran. Penulis dan penggubal kursus perlu menilai semula teks-teks yang dipilih sebagai teks pembelajaran kursus BAAL. Diharapkan hasil kajian ini dapat dimanfaatkan oleh pihak penggubal buku-buku kursus bahasa Arab untuk menambah baik kualiti kebolehbacaan pelajar.

Abstract: Efforts to improve Arabic  courses at the Higher Educational Institutions (HEI) can further enhance students' language proficiency. Students' proficiency in Arabic can be measured by their ability to read the text they are learning. Therefore, this study aims to identify the level of readability of the Advanced Academic Arabic Course (BAAL) e-book for undergraduate students at one of the Malaysia Higher Education. A quantitative survey design was carried out on 100 students in five Islamic studies undergraduate study programs with honors at one of the HEIs in Malaysia. The data that has been analyzed through descriptive analysis shows that the level of readability of the BAAL text as a whole is at a frustrational level which is not suitable for teaching purposes. Writers and course writers should reevaluate texts selected as academic texts for the BAAL course. It is hoped that the results of this study can be used by  Arabic textbook writers to improve the quality of students' reading ability.

References

Aisyah Sjahrony, Maimun Aqsha Lubis, Nik Mohd Rahimi & Mohd Sham Kamis. 2017. ASEAN Comparative Education Research Journal on Islam and Civilization (ACER-J) 1(1): 25-40.

Aisyah Sjahrony. 2014. Hubungan Antara Tahap Kebolehbacaan Buku Teks Maharat Al-Qiraah Dengan Motivasi Dan Pencapaian Pelajar FPI UKM. Tesis Master. Fakulti Pendidikan UKM, Bangi Selangor.

Ala Muhammad Al Saadi, Wail Muin (Al-Haj sa'id) Ismail , Muhammad Azhar bin Zailani, Tareq Mohamad Alyatim & Zaharah Binti Hussin. 2020. Readability Of The Second Grade Arabic Language Books In The United Arab Emirates. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 8(2): 773-780.

Anuar Sopian. 2017. Analisis isi kandungan buku teks bahasa Arab “al-Munīr al-Lughah al-‘Arabiyyah al-Ittisaliyyah”. Journal of Humanities, Languages, Culture and Business, 1(1): 35 - 44.

Chall, J. S. & Conard, S. 1991. Should textbooks challenge students? The case for easier or harder books. New York: Teachers College Press.

Coleman, P. D. 1962. Failure to localize the source distance of an unfamiliar sound. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34: 345-346.

Conrad K.J., Conrad K.M., Mazza J, Riley B.B., Stein M.A., Funk R, & Dennis M.L. 2012. Dimensionality, hierarchical structure, age generalizability, and criterion validity of the GAIN's Behavioral Complexity Scale. Psychological Assessment.

Dahlia Janan. 2016. Guru Dan Keterampilan Membaca Dalam Kalangan Murid. Malay Language Journal - Dian Bahasa 6-22.

Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. 2000. Item response theory for psychologists. t.tp.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Fisher Jr., W. P. 2007. Rating scale instrument quality criteria. Rasch Measurement Transaction, 21, 1095. Retrived from http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt211a.htm

Fry, E. 1977. Elementary reading instruction. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Gambrell, L., Wilson, R. & Gantt, W. 1981. Classroom observations of task- attending behaviors of good and poor readers. Journal of Educational Research 74: 400–404.

Harison Mohd Sidek. 2010. Reading Instruction: Theory and Practice. Bandar Baru Nilai: USIM.

Kamarulzaman Abdul Ghani. 2011. Kebolehbacaan Buku Teks Bahasa Arab TinggiBerasaskan Ujian Kloz dalam Kalangan Pelajar di SMKA. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies 11(2): 53-66 .

Kamarulzaman Abdul Ghani. 2010. Kebolehbacaan Buku Teks Bahasa Arab Tinggi Tingkatan Empat Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Agama. Tesis Doktor Falsafah Pendidikan. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya.

Kamaruzaman Jusoff, Mohamad Shanudin Zakaria, Khairul Anwar Mastor & Siti Rahayah Ariffin. 2009. Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan soal selidik gaya e-pembelajaran (eLSE) versi 8.1 menggunakan model pengukuran Rasch. Journal of Quality Measurement and Analysis 5(2): 15–27.

Khadijah Rohani Mohd. Yunus. 2001. Kebolehbacaan Dalam Buku Teks. Bahan Kursus Penulisan Buku Teks Sekolah Menengah, Bahagian Buku Teks, KPM Dan Majlis Buku Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Krejcie R. V. & Morgan D. W. 1970. Determining Sample Size for Research Activities Educational and Psychological Measurement 30(3): 607-610.

Linacre J. M. 2012. A User’s Guide to WINSTEPS: Rasch Model Computer Programs. Chicago: MESA Press

Linacre J. M. 1994. Sample Size and Item Calibration Stability. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 7:4.

Marohaini Yusoff. 1999. Strategi Pengajaran Bacaan dan Kefahaman. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Marohaini Yusoff. 2014. Strategi Pengajaran Bacaan dan Kefahaman. Batu Caves: PTS Akademia.

Mohd Fadzli Ismail. 2022. Kebolehbacaan Buku Teks Bahasa Arab Kurikulum Bersepadu Dini (KBD) Tingkatan Empat di Sekolah Agama Bantuan Kerajaan(SABK). Tesis Doktor Falsafah. Fakulti Pendidikan. UKM.

Mohd Hazli Yah @ Alias, Maimun Aqsha Lubis & Mahani Mohamad. 2019. Kemahiran membaca teks Arab sebagai bahasa kedua: Penelitian dari perspektif teori dan kurikulum. INSANIAH: Online Journal of Language, Communication, and Humanities 2(1): 26–44.

Mohd Rafaie Kusnin & Harun Baharudin. 2015. Kebolehbacaan Syarhu Ibnu Aqil Sebagai Buku teks STAM: Satu Tinjauan Literatur. Prosiding Persidangan Kebangsaan Bahasa Arab (NCAL 2015), hal. 130-137.

Muhammad Haron Husaini, Abdul Razif Zaini, Ab. Halim Mohamad & Khairil Ashraf Elias. 2016.Penilaian Kebolehbacaan Teks Arab Menerusi Ujian Kloz Berasaskan Aplikasi Komputer. Jurnal AL-ANWAR 1(1): 38- 55.

Nadzirah Norudin. 2020. Kesukaran Item Kosa Kata Kerja Al-Quran Dalam Ujian Kosa Kata Al-Quran (QVT) Bagi Set 1, 4 dan 7 Menggunakan Model Pengukuran Rasch. Latihan Ilmiah. Fakulti Pengajian Islam, UKM Bangi.

Nur Aimi Aqilah Harun. 2019. Penilaian Kosa Kata (Kata Kerja) dalam Al Quran (Surah Al-Mulk) dalam Kalangan Pelajar Fakulti Pengajian Islam Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Tesis. Fakulti Pengajian Islam. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Rini Dwi Susanti. 2014. Strategi pengajaran membaca pada mata pelajaran bahasa Arab di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Elementary Journal 2(2).

Robson, C. 1998. Real world research. UK: Blackwell Publisher Itd.

Rosni Samah, Mohd Fauzi Abdul Hamid, Shaferul Hafes Sha’ari & Amizan Helmi Mohamad. 2013. Aktiviti Pengajaran Kemahiran Bertutur Bahasa Arab Dalam Kalangan Jurulatih Debat. GEMA Online™ Journal of Language Studies 13(2).

Shaye Al Shaye & Mohamed Doheim Al Dhefeiri. 2021. Readability Level of Arabic Language Textbook of the Sixth Grade in the State of Kuwait. Journal of Educational and Social Research 11(4): 197-212.

Toiemah, R.A. 1978. The use of cloze to measure the profeciency of students of Arabic as a second language in some universities in the United States. Ph.D thesis, unpublished. University of Minnesota: Dissertation Abstract International.

Toeimah, R.A. 1985. Dalil ‘Amal fi ‘I’dad al-Mawad al-Ta’limiyyah li Baramij Ta’lim al-‘Arabiyyah. Makkah Al-Mukarramah: Jami’at Umm Al-Qura.

Toiemah, R.A. 1984. Ikhtibar al-Tatimmah wa Ta’lim al-‘Arabiyyah ka Lughah Thaniyyah. Dlm. Abdullah Sulaiman al-Jarbu’ & Ahmad Tu’aimah. Majallat Ma’had al-Lughah al-Arabiyyah. 2, 513-556: Makkah al-Mukarramah: Jami’at Umm al-Qura.

Viera, A.J. & Garrett, J.M. 2005. Understanding Interobserver Agreement The Kappa Statistic. Family Medicine 37: 360-363.

Yahya Othman. 2004. Mengajar Membaca Teori Dan Aplikasi: Panduan Meningkatkan Kemahiran Mengajar Membaca. Bentong: PTS Publication & Distribution Sdn. Bhd.

Yayan Nurbayan & Ihwan Rahman Bahtiar. 2019. The Readibility of the Arabic Textbook for the Students of Senior High School in Indonesia Written by Zakiyah Arifah & Nadia Afidati. EDUCARE: International Journal for Educational Studies 12(1): 25-38.

Zamri Arifin, Zulazhan Ab. Halim & Kaseh Abu Bakar. 2013. The Readability of Balaghah Textbook of Malaysian Higher Certificate of Religion (Stam): A Pilot Study. Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences 7(2): 192-199.

Zulazhan Ab. Halim, Zamri Arifin, Kaseh Abu Bakar & Abdul Wahid Salih. 2011. Ikhtibar al-Tatimmah wa Maqru’iyyah Kitab al-Balaghah fi Maliziyya. Prosiding Seminar Antarabangsa Pengajaran Bahasa Arab 2011 ( SAPBA 2011).

Zulazhan Bin Ab. Halim. 2011. Kebolehbacaan Buku Teks Balaghah Sijil Tinggi Agama Malaysia Di Sekolah-Sekolah Menengah Agama Negeri. Tesis Doktor Falsafah. Fakulti Pengajian Islam Malaysia. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-24